|
1.1.1 Alternative 8 – Inshore Gulf of Maine Juvenile Cod HAPC
The PDT offered the Committee two options for mapping the depth interval: the exact depth or the depth contour. The exact depth option eliminates areas within bays that don’t meet the depth requirement which leaves interesting gaps in th HAPC designation. Also, the PDT recommended that, based on the MA DMF Technical Report #12, it is appropriate to consider extending the depth band that defines the HAPC to 20 meters for public comment. Lastly, staff noted the APs recommendation that the data be analyzed to see if there is justification for extending the HAPC alternatie to the south side of Cape Cod and including the area all the way to Montauk. Staff noted that if this was the case, then the name of the alternative would change to reflect the geographic inclusion. Committee Consensus: The Committee agreed to map the Inshore GOM Juvenile Cod HAPC by the appropriate depth contour as opposed to the exact depth option.
Motion 12
Passed 4/0/0 Committee consensus:
Motion 13
Passed 4/0/0 Audience: Mr. Smolowitz suggested that it would be prudent to ask the public what is the main threat to each of the HAPC alternatives. Inshore Gulf of Maine Earlier version Based on the information presented on juvenile Atlantic cod and the inshore areas of the Gulf of Maine, the EFH Technical Team suggests that the areas identified in this report and on Figure 4.1 meet the criteria for designation as an HAPC. A coastal HAPC designation would be justified on the criteria of ecological function and sensitivity to induced environmental degradation. An HAPC designation for the nearshore Gulf of Maine could assist in the enhancement of Atlantic cod, American lobster, and other groundfish species. Potential measures to protect this proposed HAPC are discussed below. The most practical approach for delineating an HAPC for settled age-0 cod is to circumscribe the reported center of distribution for this life stage throughout the range of the stock. The information available suggests that the HAPC should be from the low tide line to a depth of 10 m (33') MLW from eastern Maine to Cape Cod, Massachusetts, conforming to the center of distribution (4-7 m). This narrow depth range describes critical habitat from settlement (<5m) through the first autumn of life and overlaps seasonal habitat of age-1 juvenile cod. It also bounds the critical nursery zone for early benthic stages of American lobster as well as important juvenile habitat for some other groundfish. Consideration of a more encompassing HAPC to the depth range occupied by most age-0 cod would involve extending the isobath to at least the 20 m (66') and might be unjustifiably exclusionary to mobile gear fisheries conducted on sandy seafloor seaward of hard bottom habitat and generally >10 m, should these gears be restricted with the proposed HAPC. The HAPC proposal should be somewhat flexible to allow modification as results from additional research and fine-scale resource mapping become available. For example, drawing a mean low water boundary of HAPC is problematic given knowledge that eelgrass beds may extend well inside embayments and river deltas, so drawing a shoreline boundary crossing from headland to headland versus across arbitrary points farther up estuary or river is initially convenient. Fine-scale mapping of most important habitat components might resolve the above dilemma and afford more localized protection to the most sensitive habitat components. It also could result in more permitted activities within the HAPC zone. Future information could also prompt consideration of extending the HAPC into contiguous waters east of Cape Cod and south of Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard into Buzzards Bay. For assessment purposes, cod inhabiting this area are considered part of the Georges Bank stock. Settled age-0 cod are taken nearshore in May by the Massachusetts DMF trawl survey (NEFMC 1998). There is no information on whether or not these fish survive the summer. They do not re-occur at larger size on later inshore surveys but that does not mean that the southern shore zone does not serve an important role relative to recruitment for the Georges Bank stock. With consideration of the above caveats, the EFH Technical Team (now the Habitat Plan Development Team) suggested that the Habitat Committee consider designating an HAPC for subtidal age-0 Atlantic cod, within the existing juvenile Atlantic cod EFH designation, from MLW to 10 m (33') below MLW extending from the international border with Canada southwestward along the entire western perimeter of the Gulf of Maine to Race Point, Provincetown, Massachusetts, including subtidal bottom to 10 m below MLW around all coastal islands. This designation could be refined at a later date, depending on the availability of better information about the actual distribution and spatial extent of seagrasses and hard bottom habitats. Essential Fish Habitat Proposed Inshore Gulf of Maine Juvenile Atlantic Cod Habitat Area of Particular Concern Figure 4.1: This map displays the area proposed for Habitat Area of Particular Concern (HAPC) designation. Within the existing boundaries of EFH for juvenile Atlantic cod, the HAPC proposal includes all areas of the perimeter of the Gulf of Maine, from the mean low water (MLW) mark out to the 10 meter isobath. End of excerpt |