NEXT PAGE
Proposal for a Habitat Area of Particular Concern for Juvenile Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) in the Nearshore Waters of the Gulf of Maine.
Prepared by: EFH Technical Team (Excerpted from the 1999 Habitat Annual Review Report)
Page 3 _ To Page 4.
Juvenile Cod Community & Interactions - Research Results
Pelagic Juvenile Settlement
Post-larval pelagic juveniles are transported by prevailing currents to shallow waters off eastern
Newfoundland beginning in May and may continue arriving in periodic pulses as late as
December (Methven and Bajdik 1994; Grant and Brown 1998). Their length upon settlement is
25-45 mm (Pinsent and Methven 1997). In southwest Nova Scotia, pelagic juveniles arrive
inshore slightly larger (- 40-50 mm) in May (Tupper and Boutilier 1995a and 1995b), whereas
influxes of larvae begin earlier in Massachusetts waters two to three months after hatching
(Bigelow and Schroeder 1953). On Georges Bank, cod settle out in July at 40-60 mm, and those
reaching rough and cobble bottom may experience reduced predation risk. This particular
habitat may be an important demographic bottleneck to benthic recruitment on Georges Bank
(Lough et al. 1989).
Pelagic juveniles exhibit no preference for habitat types at settlement, and they occupy rock reef,
cobble, eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds, and sand bottom (Tupper and Boutilier 1995b). Tupper
and Boutilier (1995b) assumed that settling also occurred on macroalgae habitat, as noted by
Keats et al. (1987) off eastern Newfoundland, however, algal stands were scarce in the St.
Margaret's Bay, Nova Scotia, study area due to subtidal grazing by sea urchins
(Strongylocentrotus drobachiensis). Sea urchins commonly leave a partially denuded or
"barren" zone along nearshore sections of the maritime provinces and Gulf of Maine.
Age-0 Movements and Diel Feeding
Shallow water depths (<5 m) and a strong attraction to features on most substratums, except
sand, afford settled juveniles an environment conducive to growth and survival (Tupper and
Boutilier 1995a; Grant and Brown 1998b). The shallowness appears to ecologically segregate
the 0-group cod from older age-groups at least during daylight (Tupper and Boutilier 1995a;
Fraser et al. 1996; Gotceitas et al. 1997; Grant and Brown 1998a and 1998b). Age-0 cod
maintain a strict diurnal foraging cycle, school (or shoal) feeding on zooplankton in a tide-related
pattern during the day, and remain near protective bottom habitat which they readily seek when
threatened (Gotceitas and Brown 1993; Gotceitas et al. 1995; Grant and Brown 1998a).
The
mottled coloring of young juveniles effectively conceals them in a pebble-gravel environmerit
(Lough et al. 1989; Gregory and Anderson 1997). In contrast, pelagic juveniles on Georges
Bank maintain a nocturnal feeding pattern (Perry and Neilson 1988). Age-0 cod cease feeding in
surface waters and disperse to the substratum at night (Grant and Brown 1998b) where they are
less active to reduce interactions with potential predators (Grant and Brown 1998a). The diel
change in vertical distribution and activity of 0-group cod coincides with a nocturnal shoreward
movement and foraging by older (age-1-3) conspecifics (Bosgstad et al. 1994; Gotceitas et al.
1997; Grant and Brown 1998a). Intercohort cannibalism is common. The occurrence of age-0
cod in very shallow water (<1.2 m) at tight (Methven and Bajkik 1994) has also been interpreted
as possibly an evasive response to predation risk (Grant and Brown 1998a).
Influence of Habitat Structure and Predation on Age-0 Demography
Tupper and Boutilier (1995b) found that the spatial pattern of settlement was altered by post-
settlement mortality in St. Margaret's Bay, Nova Scotia.
Age-0 survival was positively
correlated with an index of rugosity, a measure of actual bottom surface or
complexity. Capture
success by fish predators (in this case, three species of Cottidae during a diurnal
field study) was
Page 3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEXT PAGE